Legal Opinion

Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners, L.P. v. Dynegy Marketing & Trade

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 22, 2009No. 14-08-00086-CVPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENT C. SULLIVAN, Justice.

This commercial dispute arises from a natural-gas seller’s failure to deliver an agreed quantity of gas to the purchaser, appellant Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners, L.P. (“Cherokee”). The seller, appellee Dynegy Marketing and Trade, 1 successfully moved for summary judgment by arguing Cherokee seeks only consequential “lost profits” damages disclaimed by the parties’ contract. We hold Cherokee has alleged compensable direct damages under the contract. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

I

BACKGROUND

Pursuant to a take-or-pay Gas Purchase Agreement (the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Tooke v. City of MexiaTexas Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. PopCap Games, Inc. v. MUMBOJUMBO, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  3. Powell Electrical Systems, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Wolf Hollow I, L.P. v. El Paso Marketing, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  5. County of Galveston v. Triple B Services, LLPCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API