Legal Opinion
Farmington Township v. High Plains Cooperative
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1990No. C4-90-682PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court granted summary judgment for respondent Dale Michel after appellant Farmington Township brought suit for an injunction. Appellant had claimed that respondent’s leasing of a liquid petroleum tank violated the local zoning ordinance because it was neither general farming nor an accessory use to general farming. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant, a township in Olmsted County, promulgated a zoning ordinance under Minn.Stat. §§ 366.10-19 (1988). The ordinance establishes a district where the permitted uses include general farming and “similar agricultural related…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Helmke v. BD. OF ADJ., CITY OF RUTHVENSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stillwater Township v. RivardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- R.L. Hexum & Associates, Inc. v. Rochester Township, Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Save Lantern Bay v. Cass County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993