Stillwater Township v. Rivard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Stillwater Township sought to enjoin respondents Burt and JoAlice Rivard from ongoing violations of the township zoning ordinance. The trial court entered judgment determining that appellant was es-topped from enforcing its zoning restrictions that prevented respondents from continuing the present uses of their property. We reverse and remand for further findings of fact.
FACTS
Respondents own a 24-acre parcel of land in Stillwater Township, Washington County, purchased in 1972. At the time of purchase, the property was zoned Residential/Agricultural B under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Farmegg Products, Inc. v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- R.L. Hexum & Associates, Inc. v. Rochester Township, Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State of Tennessee v. Edward Jerome HarbisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020