Legal Opinion
R.L. Hexum & Associates, Inc. v. Rochester Township, Board of Supervisors
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 2000No. C0-99-1615PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellants R.L. Hexum and Associates, Inc., and David T. Bishop challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Rochester Township Board of Supervisors. Appellants argue that the district court erred in (1) concluding that the proposed use was consistent with local ordinances governing farming and uses “similar to” general farming and (2) precluding the submission of new evi dence during review of the municipal proceedings. We affirm.
FACTS
In October 1997, Seneca Foods Corporation (Seneca) applied to the Rochester Township Planning and Zoning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Board of Supervisors v. Carver County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meleyco Partnership No. 2 v. City of West St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016