Legal Opinion
Holsinger v. New England Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 10, 1991No. 90-72471PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 5 APRIL 1991 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
FACTS
The essential facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff’s decedent ingested a quantity of drugs which resulted in his death. Plaintiff made a claim, through the decedent’s ERISA plan, against the defendant insurance company based on the accidental death of her decedent. The defendant denied the claim, claiming that the death was not accidental. This suit followed.
Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on 5 April 1991. Plaintiff responded on 3 May 1991. No oral argument…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dolores K. Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General Motors, and General Motors Life and Disability Benefits ProgramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Nelson v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
- McLain v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Bevans v. Iron Workers' Tri-State Welfare PlanDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.