Legal Opinion

People v. Prather

California Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1901No. Crim. No. 761PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant has been convicted of the crime of perjury, and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. He first attacks the validity of the impanelment of the grand jury which found the indictment against him.

Among other matters, section 242 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides: "When, of the persons summoned as grand jurors, and not excused, nineteen are present, they shall constitute the gland jury. If more than nineteen of such persons are present, the clerk shall write their names on separate ballots, which he must fold so that the names cannot be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. SeiterleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. RayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. State v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. SourisseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API