Legal Opinion

People v. Leonard

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1895No. 21145PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial, and from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The appellant, H. M. Leonard, was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison for the term of three years.

He appeals from the judgment, from an order denying his motion for a new trial, and from an order refusing to arrest the judgment. The indictment avers that the defendant, on the eighth day of May, 1893, at the county of Santa Clara, state of California, was “ an officer, manager, and servant of the Bank of Santa Clara, a corporation duly created, organized, and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Bruner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re GannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. State v. BondIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API