Legal Opinion

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Metal Exchange Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 18, 1988No. Civ. 87-2591PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this action, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the States of Florida and New Jersey seek the issuance of injunctive and ancillary equitable relief against various persons and corporations allegedly engaged in conduct which violates the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., N.J.S.A. 49:3-60, et seq., and Fla.Stat.Ann. § 517.101 et seq.

In July of 1987, the court granted such relief as against defendants American Metals Exchange (“AME”), Anglo Swiss Metals (“Anglo Swiss”), FC & M Investment Corp. (“FC…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Apollo Technologies Corp. v. Centrosphere Industrial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
  3. In Re Midlantic Corp. Shareholder LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Mike Rosen & Associates, P.C. v. Omega Builders, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. RosenbergDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API