Legal Opinion

State v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 16, 1992No. 88-1122, 90-1100, 90-1111 & 90-1176; CA A70354 (Control), A70355, A70356 & A70357PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4), and pled guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving while suspended. ORS 811.175; ORS 811.182. The trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the possession charge. There was sufficient evidence to create a jury question whether he knowingly possessed cocaine.

Defendant also challenges the sentence imposed for his possession conviction. Under the sentencing guidelines, he came within grid block 1G, which has a presumptive probationary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API