Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1995No. 10-92-09756B; CA A81447PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

We allow defendant’s motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 131 Or App 85, 883 P2d 918 (1994), and adhere to it.

Defendant was convicted of murder and, on appeal, assigned error to four of the five aggravating factors used by the court in imposing a departure sentence. We held that, even assuming that we agreed with defendant’s assignments, because defendant did not challenge one of the factors, the case did not require remand.

Defendant contends that our holding was based on a factual error. ORAP 6.25(1). She argues:

“[Defendant’s] quarrel is with this court’s statement that the trial court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SawatzkyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. JennichesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API