Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 2005No. C002847CR and C011876CR; A117220 and A117851PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Allen, 198 Or App 392, 108 P3d 651 (2005), in which we vacated the sentences of two of defendant’s three drug offense convictions and remanded for resentencing. Defendant asserted that the imposition of a departure sentence on two of those convictions based on a judicial finding that he was on supervision at the time of the crime violated the Sixth Amendment as interpreted in Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). We agreed that, although the argument was unpreserved, the sentence was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. LennonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Markwood v. RenardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API