Legal Opinion

State v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 1992No. 90P-3058; CA A68475PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm. ORS 163.118(1)(a); ORS 161.610. She challenges the part of her sentence that requires her to repay $5,000 for court-appointed attorney fees. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the court did not inquire into her financial resources or her present or future ability to pay attorney fees, as required by ORS 161.665(3). 1 The state contends that defendant did not object and cannot, therefore, raise the issue on appeal.

Under ORS 161.665(1),(2), the court was authorized to impose payment of court appointed attorney fees as part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. ChristmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. GigerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API