Legal Opinion

Dehmel v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 5, 1929:

Fowler, J.

The defendant assigns two errors: denial of his motion for a directed verdict, and denial of his motion to change the answers of the jury to the questions respecting negligence in operating and controlling the elevator. Thus the sole question for determination is whether the evidence sustains the verdict.

The findings of no failure of duty respecting inspection and keeping in repair are well supported by the evidence. The case is one in which the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies. The proof that Mrs. Dehmel was injured by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dibbert v. Metropolitan Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Rost v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Delap v. LiebensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Thomas Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koehler v. Thiensville State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. CorreiaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Implement Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. GoldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Senft v. Ed. Schuster & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Matsumoto v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API