Rost v. Roberts
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 6, 1923:
Owen, J.
The issues developed during the trial were about as follows: Plaintiff contended that the defendant was guilty of negligent practice in administering an over-dosage of X-radiance. The factors to be considered in determining the amount of X-ray dosage administered are *210(1) target distance from the skin; (2) milliamperes of .current used; (3) duration and frequency of exposure; and (4) spark gap. There was a conflict in the evidence with reference to two of these factors, namely, target distance and duration of exposure. The defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Musbach v. Wisconsin Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Gilbert v. State, Medical Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Koehler v. Thiensville State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.