Legal Opinion

Rost v. Roberts

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed February 6, 1923:

Owen, J.

The issues developed during the trial were about as follows: Plaintiff contended that the defendant was guilty of negligent practice in administering an over-dosage of X-radiance. The factors to be considered in determining the amount of X-ray dosage administered are *210(1) target distance from the skin; (2) milliamperes of .current used; (3) duration and frequency of exposure; and (4) spark gap. There was a conflict in the evidence with reference to two of these factors, namely, target distance and duration of exposure. The defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Cummings v. National Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Musbach v. Wisconsin Chair Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Matuschka v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gilbert v. State, Medical Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Koehler v. Thiensville State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API