Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Thomas Furnace Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.
It is plaintiff’s contention that the furnace company failed to furnish to Mullens a safe place of employment. Sec. 101.06, Stats. 1923, formerly sec. 2394 — 48, Stats. 1917, provides:
“Every employer shall furnish employment which shall be safe for the employees therein and shall furnish a place of employment which shall be safe for employees therein and for frequenters thereof, and shall furnish and use safety devices and safeguards, and shall adopt and use methods and processes reasonably adequate to render such employment and places of employment safe, and shall do every other thing…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Olson v. Whitney Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mullen v. Larson-Morgan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Mayer v. Texas Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Dehmel v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Delap v. LiebensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Dehmel v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.