Wingert v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from an order discharging a rule to show cause why judgment of non pros, should not be entered in this action of assumpsit for want of prosecution. As the order is discretionary, we inquire only whether there has been abuse of discretion, and as the elements generally to be considered in such review were recently stated in Potter Title, etc., Co. v. Frank, 298 Pa. 137, 148 A. 50, we need not again repeat them.
The suit was brought in 1913 against three defendants, Anderson, Beach and Corbet. The docket entries show that the case was actively litigated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Potter Title & Trust Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Beach's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- MARGOLIS v. BLECHERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Herb v. SnyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Aldridge v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.