Aldridge v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Chief Justice Jones,
This appeal is from a judgment of non pros entered on the defendant’s petition.
Where a plaintiff neglects to prosecute his suit diligently and the delay would be harmfully prejudicial to the defendant, if the suit were to be put to trial,, the entry of a judgment of non pros is appropriate: Alker, v. The Philadelphia National Bank, 372 Pa. 327, 332-333, 93 A. 2d 699.
The facts appearing of record in the present case, and referred to in the opinion of President Judge Mc-Naughsr for the court en banc, fully justify the action of the .court below in entering the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alker v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Wingert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Kennedy v. Bulletin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Carter v. AmickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Deitrich v. DeitrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.