Legal Opinion

Aldridge v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1958No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Jones,

This appeal is from a judgment of non pros entered on the defendant’s petition.

Where a plaintiff neglects to prosecute his suit diligently and the delay would be harmfully prejudicial to the defendant, if the suit were to be put to trial,, the entry of a judgment of non pros is appropriate: Alker, v. The Philadelphia National Bank, 372 Pa. 327, 332-333, 93 A. 2d 699.

The facts appearing of record in the present case, and referred to in the opinion of President Judge Mc-Naughsr for the court en banc, fully justify the action of the .court below in entering the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alker v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Wingert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Kennedy v. Bulletin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Carter v. AmickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Deitrich v. DeitrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API