Legal Opinion
Kent Stores of New Jersey v. Wilentz
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 11, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
The Legislature of New Jersey by chapter 281 of the Laws of 1935 (N.J.St. Annual 1935, § *225 — 17 et seq.) undertook the extensive regulation of the cleaning and dyeing trade. This industry seems to have received considerable legislative and judicial attention. A code of fair competition under the late National Recovery Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., was approved, and therefore promulgated by the President on November 8, 1933, ^Bulletin No. 101, Registry No. 1714-422, ^N. R. A. Article IV of this Code provided a specific schedule of minimum wages and Article VI set up a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc. v. State Dry Cleaners' BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- State Ex Rel. New Mexico Dry Cleaning Board v. CauthenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Becker v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
- Pueblo v. RoigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.