Legal Opinion
Freddy Dale Kuykendall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1968No. 9637PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Kuykendall, classified by his local draft board as I-O, i.e. a conscientious objector opposed to combatant and uoncombatant service in the Armed Forces, was charged under Section 462 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.App. § 462, with knowingly failing to obey an order of the Board to report to a place of civilian employment in lieu of induction. Kuykendall, a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses, defended on the ground that he was a minister of religion and consequently entitled to exemption from training or service in the Armed Forces under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- John Harris Fleming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Lydle Wayne Fitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Richard Arlen Badger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Daniel Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- David Earl Fore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- David Leroy Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Ronald Dean Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Ronald Dean Pittman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.