Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pike v. United States

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 11, 2012No. Case No. 3:11-cv-1016PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge.

Pending before the court is the plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 10), to which the government filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 13), the plaintiff filed a Reply (Docket No. 16), and the government filed a Sur-Reply (Docket No. 19). For the reasons stated herein, the Motion for Leave to Amend will be granted, and the plaintiff will be directed to file an Amended Complaint consistent with this Memorandum.

BACKGROUND

I. Factual Background1

This case concerns a single incident involving state and local law enforcement…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Atkins v. BarnesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
  2. CHALLENGER v. BASSOLINODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  3. Cook v. McMinn County, TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Dakins Sackie v. Officer Damein Lobach, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Elmer Dean Binkley v. Patrick Turner and Ryan NicholsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API