Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Department of Social Security
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1942No. Nos. 28637, 28626, 28627PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
James R. Morgan, Laura M. Camfield, and William L. Jacobson, being needy persons, were, prior to December, 1940, receiving from the state monthly allowances by way of what was popularly referred to as old-age pensions. After the effective date of initiative measure No. 141, passed by vote of the people November 5, 1940, proclaimed by the governor December 5, 1940, and printed as chapter 1, p. 3, Laws of 1941 (Rem. Supp. 1941 § 9998-34 et seq.), the three persons above named, each already receiving relief as a needy person, were considered as applicants for senior citizen grants, according to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- H. Duys Co., Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Chas. Uhden, Inc. v. GreenoughWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Washington State Coalition for the Homeless v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.