Legal Opinion
Chas. Uhden, Inc. v. Greenough
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1935No. 25398. En BancPublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAKE and GERAGHTY, JJ., dissent. This action involves the constitutionality and applicability of chapter 12, Laws of 1933, Ex. Ses., p. 26 (Rem. 1934 Sup., § 3035-1 [P.C. § 77-11] et seq.), generally referred to as the Washington agricultural adjustment act.
The act first contains what is practically a replica of the Federal agricultural adjustment act in the statement of the necessity for protection of agriculture, and also contains an emergency clause declaring it to be necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health and safety, for the preservation of the financial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Barry & Barry, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.