Legal Opinion

Savic v. Kramlich

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1932No. 5810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LE'E, C. J.-

— Plaintiff and respondent, Paul G. Savic, claiming to be a shareholder owning 2,004 shares of the capital stock of the Crystal Dome Oil & Gas Company, an Idaho corporation, for which stock no certificate had been issued, sued defendants and appellants, B. P. Kramlich and Charles F. Reddoch, respectively president and secretary of said company, for a writ of mandate compelling them to issue him a certificate for the stock aforesaid. He plead that on August 10, 1929, the company’s board of directors, in regular meeting, all being present, adopted the following resolution:

“ ‘Moved,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific National Bank v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Dennett v. Acme Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  3. California Trona Co. v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Sturner v. James A. McCandless Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Capitol Petroleum Co. v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Large v. Hayes by and Through NesbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Weitz v. WeitzIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Storrer v. RussoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Tahmisian v. Netacent, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API