Legal Opinion

Brader v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1962No. 36921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Defendant, the city of Chicago, appeals directly from a declaratory judgment entered in the circuit court of Cook County declaring the Chicago zoning ordinance void as applied to plaintiffs’ property. The trial judge has certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that the public interest requires a direct appeal to this court, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1961, chap, no, par. 7S(i)(c)) and, accordingly, this court has jurisdiction.

Defendant contends that plaintiffs have brought this action prematurely because they failed to exhaust all administrative and legislative local…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bright v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. County of Lake v. MacNealIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Bank of Lyons v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Herman v. Village of HillsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oregon City v. HartkeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cosmopolitan National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Horan v. FoleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Cushing v. PitmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API