Legal Opinion

Benjamin v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1962No. 3073PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

This action for breach of implied warranty alleged that plaintiff had become ill as a result of eating unwholesome food served by defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, ruling that plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case.

Plaintiff, a registered nurse, was the only witness in her own behalf. She testified that on the day when her illness began, she was in attendance upon a patient at the Washington Hospital Center. For her evening meal she went.to a cafeteria operated by defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Doctors Hospital, Inc. v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  3. Lohse v. CoffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. v. DrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Hamilan Corporation, T/a Manger-Hamilton Hotel v. Jeanni M. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Rodriguez v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Fajardo v. CammackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Waggaman v. ForstmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Hoyte v. Yum! Brands, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API