Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Langley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1967No. 16971PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Justice.

This is a products liability case. Ap-pellees Virginia Langley and husband, Willis Langley, sued appellants Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing Company and Tom Thumb Stores, Inc. for damages alleged to have resulted from the use by Mrs. Langley of home permanent hair wave products called “Milk Wave Lilt.”1 Appellees allege that the three appellants are respectively the manufacturer, the wholesale distributor and the retail seller of the products.

In their pleadings appellees allege specifically that appellants Procter & Gamble…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Jacob E. Decker & Sons, Inc. v. CappsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Shamrock Fuel & Oil Sales Co. v. TunksTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Dias v. Daisy-HeddonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API