Legal Opinion
Waggaman v. Forstmann
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1966No. 3807PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge:
Appellants sued appellee for alleged damages to their furnished apartment in the amount of $1,489.30 1 during appellee’s tenancy resulting from his use of the premises and its furnishings beyond ordinary wear and tear. After trial by jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the landlords for $175, which appellants challenge on this appeal as inadequate. They contend the trial judge erred in refusing to permit three witnesses, whom they proffered as experts, to state their conclusions relating to wear and tear for guidance of the jury in reaching a verdict. These…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Kenney v. Washington Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Henkel v. VarnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Benjamin v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Pollard v. HawfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Toy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.