State v. Latour
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The dispositive issue in this direct appeal is whether the denial of a defendant’s request to exercise a peremptory challenge of a venireperson, who served solely as an alternate, can constitute an impropriety that requires a new trial in the absence of an analysis on the issue of harm. The defendant, Michael J. Latour, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, claiming that the trial court improperly denied his peremptory challenge of a venireperson and that the impropriety was a structural error requiring a new trial. We affirm the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. George J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.