Legal Opinion

State v. Latour

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 13, 2005No. SC 17177PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The dispositive issue in this direct appeal is whether the denial of a defendant’s request to exercise a peremptory challenge of a venireperson, who served solely as an alternate, can constitute an impropriety that requires a new trial in the absence of an analysis on the issue of harm. The defendant, Michael J. Latour, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, claiming that the trial court improperly denied his peremptory challenge of a venireperson and that the impropriety was a structural error requiring a new trial. We affirm the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. George J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API