Legal Opinion
State v. McKellips
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 2002No. 37886PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Robert John McKellips was charged with four counts of driving under the influence. After a preliminary hearing, McKellips filed a motion to suppress the results of the urine and blood tests that showed he had been smoking marijuana. In his motion, McKellips argued that both his consent to provide the samples and the actual collection of the samples occurred more than sixty minutes after his detention in violation of NRS 171.123, the temporary detention statute. The district court granted McKellips’ motion to suppress. The State appeals from the district court’s order, arguing that…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Fayer v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- State v. RinconNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Camacho v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RuscettaNevada Supreme Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.