Legal Opinion

State v. Ruscetta

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2007No. 47047PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Parraguirre, J.:

In this appeal, we clarify the test for determining the scope of consensual vehicular searches. In doing so, we revisit our decision in State v. Johnson, 2 where a majority of the court concluded that dismantling a vehicle glove box exceeds the scope of general consent to search a vehicle and is therefore unreasonable. We now clarify that the proper test in cases involving consensual vehicular searches is one that examines the totality of the circumstances for objective reasonableness.

Although the district court applied the proper test in this case, it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Walter George Strickland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Rosky v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States v. George SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. TroxellTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Somee v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Cortes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hernandez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Knipes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Chittenden v. Just. Ct. of Pahrump Twp.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API