Woodland v. Cote

The plaintiff was injured in a collision while riding as a passenger in an automobile owned by the defendant Cote and driven by the defendant Wheat.

The defendant Cote was not present at the time of the accident, and the question was litigated whether or not her automobile was being driven at that time with her implied consent. There was *255testimony that one Theodore was an intimate friend of the defendant Cote, used her car at will, had possession of it and its keys a large part of the time, paid for gas and repairs, and that he and his employees operated it in his business. There was testimony…