O'NEIL v. Prosper Oil Company
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal from orders denying Layne Lindberg’s motion to amend his answer and counterclaim and denying his demand for jury trial. Lindberg, a co-defendant in three collection actions, moved to amend his answer and counterclaim in two of those actions to allege tortious interference with contract and slander. Lind-berg demanded a jury trial for the first time in the proposed amended answer and counterclaim. The trial court denied Lind-berg’s motion to amend and his demand for jury trial. Lindberg appealed.
Where, as here, there is an appeal and there remain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- United Hospital v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BloomquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Selland v. SellandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993