Legal Opinion

O'NEIL v. Prosper Oil Company

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1989No. Civ. 890172, 890192 and 890193PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from orders denying Layne Lindberg’s motion to amend his answer and counterclaim and denying his demand for jury trial. Lindberg, a co-defendant in three collection actions, moved to amend his answer and counterclaim in two of those actions to allege tortious interference with contract and slander. Lind-berg demanded a jury trial for the first time in the proposed amended answer and counterclaim. The trial court denied Lind-berg’s motion to amend and his demand for jury trial. Lindberg appealed.

Where, as here, there is an appeal and there remain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Gast Construction Co. v. Brighton PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United Hospital v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. BloomquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GoetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Gissel v. Kenmare TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Selland v. SellandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API