Johnson v. Genesee County, Michigan

ROTH, District Judge.

To avoid needless repetition, the statement of facts in the opinion of the three-judge court, Johnson et al. v. Genesee County, D.C., 232 F.Supp. 563, is hereby adopted and incorporated in this opinion.

The thrust of the plaintiff’s complaint is that the sewer improvement here in question was authorized by an affirmative vote of members of the Board of Supervisors representing less than a majority of the population of the county, and that, as a consequence, the majority of the population may be exposed to a contingent financial liability because of the pledging of the full…