Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Burns
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 1, 1966No. Civ. A. 4010PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*825OPINION
GRAY, District Judge.
This action was instituted by plaintiffs for a declaratory judgment that the provisions of Chapter 426 of the Private Acts of Tennessee, 1943, as amended, pertaining to the apportionment of the Rutherford County School Commission, violate rights secured to them by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and are, therefore, void. Injunctive relief was also sought.1
The parties entered into a stipulation with thirteen numbered paragraphs. It, together with exhibits, is attached as an Appendix, and references to it hereinafter are to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Oliver v. Board of Education of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Cavanagh v. BrockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Hyden v. BakerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.