Legal Opinion

Hyden v. Baker

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 13, 1968No. Civ. 4674, 4697PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK GRAY, Jr., District Judge.

In these actions, the respective plaintiffs allege that the provisions of T.C.A. § 19-101, portions of private acts related thereto, and the last grammatical sentence of Article VI, § 15, of the Tennessee Constitution, have resulted in an unconstitutional malapportionment of the quarterly county courts of their respective counties and of other counties in Tennessee.1 The thrust of the complaints is twofold: first, that the equal population or “one-man, one-vote” principle enunciated in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964),…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Griffin v. School Bd. of Prince Edward Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  3. Krzewinski v. KuglerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
  4. Lazarus v. FairclothDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1969
  5. Anderson v. EllingtonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API