Legal Opinion
Franchey v. Hannes
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
This appeal arises from a new trial following our decision in Franchey v. Hannes, 152 Conn. 372, 207 A.2d 268. In that case, the facts of which furnish the background of the present case, we sustained the court’s conclusion that the defendants’ fraudulent nondisclosure in January, 1959, induced the plaintiffs to buy the defendants’ prop erty. We found that the court erred, however, in computing the damages to which the plaintiffs were entitled. Franchey v. Hannes, supra, 381. We remanded the case with direction to render judgment for the plaintiffs to recover such damages as they may prove on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Green v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Moore v. SlonimDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Way v. PaventSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Applied Data Processing, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.