Legal Opinion

In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 30, 2015No. Master File No. 14-cv-03264-JDPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*921ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINTS

JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge

In these consolidated antitrust class actions, plaintiffs are direct and indirect purchasers of capacitors, a ubiquitous component in electronic devices of all types. The gist of the complaints is that the defendant manufacturers have conspired to fix capacitor prices in the global market.

The Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ initial motions to dismiss the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ (“DPPs”) and indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ .(“IPPs”) consolidated complaints. Dkt. No. 710. The DPPs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Christian v. BetakDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Fraser v. Team Health Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  4. Hickcox v. Rocket Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Hightower v. Celestron Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API