Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 2, 2021No. 5:20-cv-03639Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 DANIEL HIGHTOWER, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-03639-EJD 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS 10 v. TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 11 CELESTRON ACQUISITION, LLC, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116, 134, 135 13 14 Plaintiff Daniel Hightower and a group of several indirect purchasers of consumer 15 telescope products (“Plaintiffs” or “IPPs”) brought this putative class action against Defendants 16 (1) Synta…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API