Kruger v. Horton
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
The primary issue in this case is whether sellers, who elect to forfeit the purchasers' interest in a real estate contract and retain payments made under the contract as liquidated damages, also are entitled to additional damages for waste or conversion for the removal of a substantial amount of standing timber by the purchasers from the property sold. We hold, based on the facts of this case, that the sellers are not entitled to damages for waste or conversion, in addition to liquidated damages under the contract.
The appellants are Donald J. Kruger and his wife, Nina (sellers), and their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cascade Security Bank v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Seattle-First National Bank v. BrommersWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Mahoney v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Judkins v. Sadler-MacNeilWashington Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nosker v. Trinity Land Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cameron Pelly And Amy Pelly, Res. v. Anatoliy Panasyuk And Sharon C.w. Tseng, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Ames v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Freeman Holdings of Washington, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2011
- City Of Seattle, App/cross-resp V. Ballard Terminal Railroad Co. L.l.c., Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.