Legal Opinion

Ames v. Ames

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 9, 2014No. Nos. 31661-1-III; 31825-7-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In 1997, Roy and Rubye Ames sold, without a written agreement, their property, consisting of farmland and timber, to their two oldest sons, Stanley and Wesley Ames. The parents retained a life estate. After another son moved to the property, the two oldest sons and their parents grew estranged. Roy and Rubye filed this action, asking the court to exercise its authority in equity to order title in the property returned to them. In the alternative, the parents sought recognition of their life estate and an unlimited right to control the property during their lives. The trial court awarded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Department of Social & Health Services v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. SAC Downtown Ltd. Partnership v. KahnWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Baker v. LeonardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lutz Tile, Inc. v. KrechCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keith L. & Kay Burdine Holmquist And Fredrick Kaseburg v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. In re Pers. Restraint of Serano SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Nellermoe Wren, Pllc, Appellant/cross-resp. v. Meesha & Stephanie Burns, Respondents/cross-apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Richard Johnson, Et Ux v. Richard SorrelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Richard Johnson, Et Ux v. Richard SorrelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API