On Rehearing
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Counsel for respondents petitioned for a rehearing. They and others appearing amici curiae suggest that, the statement in the opinion to the effect that neither of the parties having questioned the validity of the statutes considered, their validity would be assumed without further consideration, raises a question as to the constitutionality of the law. Where neither party challenges the validity of a statute a contention that the court's failure to do so raises a question as to its constitutionality is an unwarranted assumption.
In view of neither of the parties in the former hearing having…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Pioneer Irrigation District v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
- Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Falls Reservoir District v. ThrallIdaho Supreme Court · 1924