Legal Opinion

American Falls Reservoir District v. Thrall

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1924Published

1Opinion

(July 23, 1924.)

ON REHEARING.

[228 Pac. 244.]

*131WILLIAM A. LEE, J.

Counsel for respondents petitioned for a rehearing. They and others appearing amid curiae suggest that, the statement in the opinion to the effect that neither of the parties having questioned the validity of the statutes considered, their validity would be assumed without further consideration, raises a questiou as to the constitutionality of the law. Where neither party challenges the validity of a statute a 'Contention that the court’s failure to do so raises a question as to its constitutionality is an unwarranted assumption.

In…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Pioneer Irrigation District v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API