Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided June 6, 1991No. 90-934Published

1Opinion of the Court

TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 90-934 of : : JUNE 6, 1991 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : CLAYTON P. ROCHE : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE ED DAVIS, MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following questions. 1. Where a city or county has elected pursuant to Government Code section 66499 to accept a surety bond to secure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lancaster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Cerini v. City of CloverdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Milo Equipment Corp. v. Elsinore Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API