Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant raises two questions: whether summary judgment was properly granted for plaintiff, and whether the court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to continue. We affirm.
I
Plaintiff and defendant agree on the terms of defendant’s policy and on the facts giving rise to this case. The issue is whether defendant’s policy provides coverage for defendant’s insured under the undisputed facts. These facts are as follows:
Defendant’s insured is a service station owner, insured by defendant under a garage liability policy which provides coverage for bodily injury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Tripp v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Peirson v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campbell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- New Bern Pool & Supply Co. v. GraubartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. PA. NAT. MUT. INS.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Cotton v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.