Legal Opinion
Standon Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1990No. E008601PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, J.
In this matter, petitioners Standon Co., Inc., and its employee Robert Roy Hand (hereinafter generally Standon) raise an issue of apparent first impression concerning the interpretation of Code of Civil Procedure section 2031. We will issue the writ to compel the trial court to exercise its discretion on the question of sanctions, but otherwise deny the relief sought.
Statement of Facts
The underlying action is one for personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff and real party in interest Hwan Kim. It is alleged that the injuries were received in an automobile accident…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lasky, Haas, Cohler & Munter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sperber v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Sexton v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Welch v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Anton's Services v. HagenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.