Legal Opinion
Welch v. Oakland Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 2001No. A092262; A092270PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
Melanie Welch (Welch) and Mark Petrofsky (Petrofsky) separately filed petitions for peremptory writ of mandate after they were dismissed from their teaching positions with the Oakland Unified School District (District) on a 15 days’ notice of termination. The trial court granted the petitions, finding that they were probationary employees entitled to 30 days’ notice and a right to hearing under Education Code section 44948.3, subdivision (a).
The District appealed, and we consolidated both appeals. The District contends that Welch was an “intern,” not a “district intern,” and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Golden Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bakersfield Elementary Teachers Ass'n v. Bakersfield City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Air MacHine Com SRL v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Fariba v. Dealer Services Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.