Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court of Riverside County

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2017No. E067296APublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

—Having read and considered the petition, the informal response we requested, and additional briefing as described below, as well as the record provided by both parties, we conclude the petition lacks merit. Our order requesting an informal response notified the parties that ‘“[t]he court may issue a peremptory writ in the first instance, or the court may deny the petition by a written opinion on the merits that determines a cause and constitutes law of the case.” All parties received ‘“due notice” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1088), and ‘“it appears that the petition and opposing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. VelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. Vela, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
  5. People v. Pineda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API