Imperial Palace v. Dawson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
The Imperial Palace, a self-insured employer, appeals a district court judgment affirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits to Isiah Dawson. Dawson had received a work-related back injury, which was later aggravated by an automobile accident that occurred while he was traveling to a physical therapy treatment. Nominally, this appeal concerns the applicability of the “going-and-coming rule” to these facts. As we perceive it, however, the more significant concern raised by this appeal centers upon how Imperial Palace delayed paying Dawson his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Moreau v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Laines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Falline v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
- Holiday Inn Downtown v. BarnettNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Lee v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Vredenburg Ex Rel. Vredenburg v. Sedgwick CMSNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Dickinson v. American Medical ResponseNevada Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.