Legal Opinion

Imperial Palace v. Dawson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1986No. 16525PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

The Imperial Palace, a self-insured employer, appeals a district court judgment affirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits to Isiah Dawson. Dawson had received a work-related back injury, which was later aggravated by an automobile accident that occurred while he was traveling to a physical therapy treatment. Nominally, this appeal concerns the applicability of the “going-and-coming rule” to these facts. As we perceive it, however, the more significant concern raised by this appeal centers upon how Imperial Palace delayed paying Dawson his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Immer and Company v. BrosnahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  2. Breen v. Caesars PalaceNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Moreau v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Laines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Falline v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Holiday Inn Downtown v. BarnettNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lee v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Vredenburg Ex Rel. Vredenburg v. Sedgwick CMSNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Dickinson v. American Medical ResponseNevada Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API