Legal Opinion

Moore v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The controlling statute on this appeal is sec. 102.18 (4), Stats. The material part of such statute reads as follows:. . It [the commission] may also on its own motion, set aside, modify, or change any order, findings, or award (whether made by an individual commissioner, an examiner, or by the commission as a body) at any time within twenty days from the date thereof if it shall discover any mistake therein, or upon the grounds of newly discovered evidence. . .

The above statute confers upon the commission the power “on its own motion” to set aside an order or award upon the ground of newly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schneider Fuel & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Harrison v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Christnovich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners of the City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Meyer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Theodore Fleisner, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nelson Mill & Agri-Center, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Appleton Electric Co. v. MinorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API