Legal Opinion

Nelson Mill & Agri-Center, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1975No. 278PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The issue presented here is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the appellant employer and its insurer were denied a full and fair hearing after reasonable notice. The state’s Workmen’s Compensation Act provides: “All parties shall be afforded opportunity for full, fair, public hearing after reasonable notice . . . .” (Sec. 102.18 (1) (a), Stats.) The act further provides: “Either party shall have the right to be present at any hearing, in person or by attorney, or any other agent, and to present such testimony as may be pertinent to the controversy before the department. . . .”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State Ex Rel. Richey v. Neenah Police & Fire CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. McCarthy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Theodore Fleisner, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gough v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bituminous Casualty Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  2. Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Dane County Hospital & Home v. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Appleton Electric Co. v. MinorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API